Email: contactus@icaica.org
Email: contactus@icaica.org
Submission Deadline:
December 14, 2025
Notification Deadline:
February 2, 2026
Registration Deadline:
February 14, 2026
Authors are invited to submit original, unpublished research manuscripts in all areas of artificial intelligence and computer applications such as microelectronic system, analog integrated circuit design, power system and smart grids, power electronic converters for energy systems, and high voltage engineering.
Submitted manuscripts must represent original unpublished research that is not currently under review for any other conference or journal. All manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer-review process and will be reviewed and judged on correctness, originality, technical strength, rigor in analysis, quality of results, quality of presentation, and interest and relevance to the conference attendees. After a rigorous reviewing process, accepted papers after proper registration and presentation will be included in conference proceedings.
Submitted manuscripts must represent original unpublished research that is not currently under review for any other conference or journal. All manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer-review process and will be reviewed and judged on correctness, originality, technical strength, rigor in analysis, quality of results, quality of presentation, and interest and relevance to the conference attendees.
As Author: Submitting Full Paper
As Presenter: Submit Abstract Only (300-400 words)
As Listener: Attending without submission
As Reviewer: Invite experts and scholars to join
All manuscripts are subject to blind peer review by competent reviewers in the relevant field and are expected to meet standards of academic excellence. The reviewers identity remain anonymous throughout the process. The review process is as below:
1. The conference secretary performs a preliminary review to confirm if the papers meet basic publishing standard or not, and then papers will go through a similarity check by Crosscheck, a professional checking tool for plagiarism. 2. Submitted papers that don't pass preliminary review or are suspected as plagiarism will be rejected directly. Furthermore, a encourage re-submission or don't encourage submission decision may be given according to the overall situation of the paper. 3. Submitted papers that pass the preliminary review will be sent to the program chair who is in charge of the peer review process. He appoints at least two suitable conference committee members as reviewers for each paper whose areas of expertise have to match with the topics of the papers. 4. In case no suitable reviewers can be drawn from the conference committee, the conference secretary will invite external reviewers to help with the review who are experts in related fields and volunteer to help. 5. Normally, each paper should require at least two individual review reports. The conference secretary must make proper arrangement and keep an eye on the reviewers feedback. If review reports are not returned within stipulated time, the conference secretary should find new reviewers in time to fill up. 6. The conference chair will make decisions about submissions, which include: Strongly accept, accept, marginally accept, reject. The conference chair remains the right to make final decision, who can also seek help from other conference committee members. 7. The conference secretary then will inform the authors, and papers which need revisions will be required to be sent back within stipulated time, and only revised papers that pass the second review will be accepted.
